![]() It's not possible to create something out of nothing, and you don't get a perceptual improvement in one category without a cost/loss elsewhere. Here's a good rule to remember in media (video and audio): Upscaling almost always ruins this, even compared to a 480 original. I now have a screen with multiple objects including splashing water with multicolored lights refecting in sparkles on those splashes, and something important to the story is happening in those spashes, so it is in detail, in focus, shot with a narrow shuttter angle. Success! (But zero detail at start and at end) I can upscale, downscale, whatever, and the image will look identical. I have a solid field of red throughout the screen. Updated rubberband library to version 3.2.1."Good", "Decent"? According to what criteria, using what sensitivities? At what distance and with what FOV, and in what kind of contrast environment? Using what kind of material? Too much of what has been said positively about this is subjective, and without objective references and benchmarks.Added Ctrl+Wheel ( command on macOS) to numeric fields to increment and decrement by a larger amount.Added Transition type > Cut to the Slideshow Generator.Both of these new filters may ONLY be added to individual tracks-audio or video. Track Seam works on a similar level but rather attempts to do a smoothing between outgoing and incoming samples around edit points. A recommended technique was to add a 2 frame Fade Audio Out and Fade Audio in filters on clips. These filters address an old problem where clicks and pops may be heard in export when switching between clips due to discontinuities in the audio stream. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |